The lecture hall at the University of New Orleans filled with students and adults curious to hear the Israeli soldiers speak. As people walked in, they were greeted by a protest banner which read: “Real soldiers. Real lives. Real people. These kids no longer have a voice to share their stories.” The image on the banner was of Palestinians walking through the streets with their dead children. While waiting for the presentation to start, one of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) speakers named Orit, asked me where she could find the bathroom. She was admittedly scared by the protestors at the entrance, all of whom were male. The protestors did not appear hostile, so her fear was most likely a manifestation of other experiences. With that said, there was undoubtedly a tense air which permeated the room, and it only got more contentious as the next hour and a half unfolded.
What were the IDF speakers here to discuss?
According to the website for Stand With Us, the group which organized the soldiers’ visit, their mission is “dedicated to informing the public about Israel and to combating the extremism and anti-Semitism that often distorts the issues.” In addition, the website states: “We believe that knowledge of the facts will correct common prejudices about the Arab-Israeli conflict, and will promote discussions and policies that can help promote peace in the Middle East.”
This event, however, did not seem to live up to this stated mission.
Before the speakers told their stories, they played a song to try and bring some unity to the collection of people in the lecture hall. As everyone rose to their feet, almost the entire room removed their jackets, hoodies, and button-up shirts, revealing red shirts underneath. Every shirt had a paper sign taped on the back with the names of children and people killed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. These blood-red shirts were clearly symbolic of the carnage which takes place every week in the disputed lands between both sides.

Protest signs in response to “Israeli Soldier Stories” event.
Photo courtesy of Peter Russo/Driftwood.
There were perhaps sixty individuals or more who joined in this silent protest. After ten minutes of standing in silence, the majority of protestors left, leaving only a few very outspoken individuals.
Amid the disorder and indignation, the two IDF soldiers (both of whom were female), tried to tell specific stories of things they have witnessed in Israel and Palestine during their service; there was even a story of how a young Palestinian child was saved by the IDF in a dangerous neighborhood, despite endangering the Israeli soldiers and medics. Both speakers emphasized that they “value human life” and want passionately for peace to come from the desperate situation.
Eventually, the speakers wrapped up their topics and points they wished to raise, and the meeting opened up into a free-for-all of bickering. There were arguments over Zionism (each side having a different opinion of what the term actually means), arguments over history, and arguments over motivations. In short, it was the usual sort of conversation which surrounds the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Palestinian protestors were unsatisfied by the answers to their questions, and many of them stormed out of the room. Drew, the other speaker, followed protestors out of the room multiple times, seeking to have a one-on-one conversation and diffuse their anger.
Unfortunately, the talk/protest provided little in terms of an academic understanding of what takes place in this conflict. There were no statistics on casualties, people displaced, or whether current policies have decreased or increased violence. The mission of Stand With Us to inform the public of the facts of the conflict did not seem to come to fruition on this day. Chloé Valdary, president of Allies of Israel, the student organization which hosted the event, attempted to explain the dysfunction.
“What led to the breakdown at Thursday’s event was a simple lack of civility on the part of certain members in the audience as well as our own failure to conduct an organized Q&A session,” said Valdary. “We were aware that protestors were going to be in the audience, but we had no idea that people from outside the school who don’t even attend the university would show up to protest the event. As such, we were ill prepared to deal with the situation.”
Serein Mohamad, who helped organize the protest, saw things differently.
“Our point was to hold a peaceful protest. We remained silent out of respect for the children whose names were taped across our chests, children that were murdered by IDF soldiers,” Mohamad said. “We had about 60 people participate, a diverse group of people, ranging from Palestinian to Honduran, Catholic to Muslim. All of us had the same motive: peace for Palestine.”
“The few guys that stayed after to talk to the IDF soldiers definitely made some good points,” continued Mohamad.
“They even got the soldiers to apologize on behalf of what Israel was doing.”
Valdary concedes that the IDF speakers apologized to the protestors “for any harm they had felt foisted upon them by the Israeli government.” However, she said this conciliatory and apologetic sentiment was not reciprocated.
“Protestors screamed in support of Hamas, a genocidal organization that calls for the death of world Jewry,” Valdary continued. “Allies of Israel and our respective affiliates want peace. We want peace with our Arab brothers and sisters and desire to coexist with them, raise our children with them, and live a sustainable, meaningful life. Unfortunately the protestors who were present, by and large, were advocating not for an end to the conflict but an end to the very existence of the state of Israel. That is pure evil.”
While Valdary and others believe peace can be achieved, Mohamad remains skeptical of the motivations of Israel and the IDF.
“Those who claim IDF soldiers are ‘peaceful’ have not seen the things I have seen,” she said. “I completely understand that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but for those who claim that Israel is the victim under the Palestinian hand obviously have never seen the other side. That’s pure ignorance.”
Needless to say, no great breakthrough happened on the UNO campus, and the band played on.




“Needless to say, no great breakthrough happened on the UNO campus, and the band played on.”
I completely agree with you. I came to UNO in hopes of sparking dialogue and meaninful discussion, as you noted I even followed students out of the room in order to talk to them and encourage discussion. Unfortunately, the 60 or so people who got up and left without even hearing me speak prevented any big breakthroughs from happening, and I left UNO with a heavy heart and tears in my eyes. I still hold my hand out, and I will remain open to anyone who wishes to talk. Thanks, Drew
As President of Allies of Israel, I have to say that I too was deeply disappointed by the outcome of the event. Yet I have learned much from this experience and would still like to create dialogue on campus with Arab and Muslim students. I make this invitation. I am on campus every day and I eat lunch around 12 or 1. If anyone, in particular Muslim or Arab students, wishes to have lunch and talk, email me. cvaldary@uno.edu. If you only want to talk via email, that is fine as well. I would love to hear your stories and just listen and get to know you. I and all of our members desire peace both on campus and in the Middle East.
Salaam,Shalom.
Chloé V.
Sadly Truth is not on the Agenda. Young People today are too caught up in the Fantastic Lies that are Broadcast in the mainstream media. Facts are of No Interest.
Doesn’t seem like a very balanced story. They cite the Israeli side numerous times, and only quote one person from the protestors’ side towards the end. You setup everything from the soldiers’ point of view, being scared of the hostilely silent protestors… scared because they had signs and were standing still and silent? Am I missing something? You present them as if they’re a horde, but personalize the soldiers stories.
I wasn’t there. Maybe that’s what it was like. Kinda doubt it though.
“While Valdary and others believe peace can be achieved, Mohamad remains skeptical of the motivations of Israel and the IDF.”
You claim the protestors want to end Israel, a frequent claim to silence discussion. I don’t see any follow up to this from the other side as to whether that is what they advocate. Yet, the claims by Allies of Israel are accepted with no skepticism.
Josh,
I’m sorry you feel that way. With that said, I can’t allow you to make baseless claims about the article. When I read your comments, I could only draw two conclusions: either you skimmed the article, or you chose to read the story with a predetermined thought about its content and message. Either way, your comments are unwarranted, and I will address each one of your criticisms point by point in an effort to clear up any misconceptions you have.
Firstly, you claim that I wrote this story from an unbalanced perspective, and that I “cite[d] the Israeli side numerous times, and only quote[d] one person from the protestors’ side towards the end.” That is incorrect. I quoted one of the organizers of the protestors, Serein Mohamad, and I quote one of the organizers who brought the Israeli soldiers to campus, Chloé Valdary. In fact, I would have loved to have used more quotes from both sides, but there is only a limited amount of word space in a newspaper. Fact check time: 1 quote from protest side; 1 quote from Israeli soldiers side.
Second, you make a claim that I personalized the soldiers while making the protestors seem like a “horde.” You wrote, “You setup everything from the soldiers’ point of view, being scared of the hostilely silent protestors.” Once again, a careful reading of the article would allow you to see I did no such thing. Allow me to quote from the first paragraph: “She [Orit] was admittedly scared by the protestors at the entrance, all of whom were male. The protestors did not appear hostile, so her fear was most likely a manifestation of other experiences.” The first sentence is simply a telling of the facts and a description of the scene. The second sentence in that quote is an acknowledgement that the fear Orit felt was not a result of anything the protestors were doing. Fact check time again: neither side was canonized and neither side was demonized.
Third, you write, “You claim the protestors want to end Israel, a frequent claim to silence discussion.” This is entirely false and a potentially libelous statement on your part. The quote you provided in your second comment is not even relevant to that claim; I’m not sure why you decided to even put it there. But to actually address your accusation, there is not a single statement from me in this article that makes that claim. The only claims made in the article are the ones from the 2 people I interviewed and provided quotes from.
Lastly, you left these parting words: “I wasn’t there. Maybe that’s what it was like. Kinda doubt it though.” Seriously? I demur at the notion that anyone would feel they had a right to come on here and make libelous statements about my article, when he in fact was note even present for the meeting. You are basically admitting to engaging in hearsay and speculation. Please refrain from commenting on this website until you take the due diligence to read articles on it with careful attention, instead of engaging in a merry war of conjecture with yourself.